User Tools

Site Tools


jn_en_2020_01_24

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
jn_en_2020_01_24 [2020/01/24 02:36] potthastjn_en_2020_01_24 [2020/01/24 03:25] (current) potthast
Line 19: Line 19:
 Science has these two main target points: insight and know-how. Insight tries to understand. Science has these two main target points: insight and know-how. Insight tries to understand.
 Know-How tries to find methods to use and employ the knowledge.  Know-How tries to find methods to use and employ the knowledge. 
- 
 Where do we see spiritual questions in this framework? How to deal with faith, with ethics Where do we see spiritual questions in this framework? How to deal with faith, with ethics
 and with the reality of God? Let us think deeper ...  and with the reality of God? Let us think deeper ... 
Line 25: Line 24:
 {{2020:2020_01_24.jpg }} {{2020:2020_01_24.jpg }}
  
-** Spiritual Framework ... **+** Physical and Spiritual Investigation ... **
  
 Clearly our brain is part of this world. Our eyes, our ears, our hands, ... the whole body Clearly our brain is part of this world. Our eyes, our ears, our hands, ... the whole body
Line 32: Line 31:
 the physical or chemical world by mathematical laws, by differential equations and  the physical or chemical world by mathematical laws, by differential equations and 
 variational principles. These equations model how things evolve, they give us the laws variational principles. These equations model how things evolve, they give us the laws
-of behaviour. Most parts of this world seem to follow differential equations - from macroscopic+of behavior. Most parts of this world seem to follow differential equations - from macroscopic
 phenomena such as the climate of the planet to the microscopic world with atoms and photons phenomena such as the climate of the planet to the microscopic world with atoms and photons
 and nuclear particles.  and nuclear particles. 
  
 +We first remark that our ethics is outside of our physical investigations. The laws of
 +this world do not tell us how we should act. They give us a framework of the type "if you want
 +to reach this goal, than that action can lead to the desired result". But it does not provide
 +an answer to the question what goals to choose. 
  
 +Further, the physical world does not tell us anything about values. Values are set by humans. 
 +We give a value to something or someone. Value is a concept which needs an active mind with
 +thoughts and emotions.
  
 +Third, our natural sciences try to investigate nature and its inhabitants. It does not investigate
 +the spiritual dimension. The humanities investigate the human mind, culture, language and
 +ethical questions. They describe the concept. Beyond that, religious studies tries to investigate
 +the way humans deal with the spiritual world. They investigate the belief in spirits, in 
 +gods and in the one God of the monotheistic religions. 
 +
 +It is difficult to investigate spirits directly. Usually, we can only investigate them by 
 +the response and actions of humans, which we observe. If you go to a Japanese temple, you can 
 +discuss and observe the behavior of the people. But it is difficult to judge whether there
 +is a spiritual being involved in the processes of the temple. We cannot see it. We cannot touch
 +it. We cannot hear it. Is it there? Does it exist? What we can definitely say is that people
 +act as if it exists. It is part of their life, their actions, their life perspective. 
  
 {{ 2020:2020_01_24_2.jpg}} {{ 2020:2020_01_24_2.jpg}}
  
-**  ... **+** Biblical Position ... **
  
 +There are very basic difficulties in dealing with the spiritual world. Humans seem to be a part
 +of it, in the sense that humans are spiritual beings. There seem to be people gifted to sense
 +spiritual phenomena, some more than others, as it is with all human talent, which is widely and
 +diversely distributed. But beyond the human mind it seems to be difficult to pin down the 
 +direct effect of the spiritual world. 
  
 +What is the cause of it? Is it impossible that the spiritual world and the physical world as
 +we know it interact? No, I do not say that. But I say that we have difficulties of proving
 +the concept in the same way as we prove other scientific concepts. What can be the reason?
 +To some extent this seems to be the effect of living beings. If you would not be able to observe,
 +touch or hear some being, you would only be able to investigate it if it causes effects
 +in a repeatedly observable way. If it changes its behavior, if it even hides itself from you,
 +you will not be able to do much. 
 +
 +There are further points which complicate the relationship between the spiritual world and
 +the human world. Let us have a look into the words of the prophet Isaiah, talking about the
 +separation of God and mankind: 
  
  <color #aa0000>  <color #aa0000>
 1 Behold, the Lord’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save, or his ear dull, that it cannot hear; 1 Behold, the Lord’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save, or his ear dull, that it cannot hear;
 2 but your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you so that he does not hear. 2 but your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you so that he does not hear.
-</color> (Jesaja 59, 1-2)+</color> (Isaiah 59, 1-2) 
 + 
 +Even if God is able to do what he wants, if he is the Lord, the most influential power of 
 +the universe, if he hides himself, you will not be able to find him. You will not be able  
 +to detect him. All your observations will go vain. He can play the cat-and-mouse game with us, 
 +but we have no chance of ever catching him. 
  
 +Does that mean we should give up, as many scientists have given up today? No, we should not give
 +up. We should play the game in a reasonable way. The only reasonable step here is to address God in a
 +proper way, to get him to answer us. And he has promised to be open to that. When we come to him
 +in an appropriate way. It is a personal way. It is a way which starts to realize who he is and
 +what he is. His holiness and his justice are a constitutive part of this process. There is much
 +to learn and to explore here, for scientists, and everyone else as well. 
 (Roland Potthast) (Roland Potthast)
  
jn_en_2020_01_24.1579829814.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/01/24 02:36 by potthast